Oil prices are falling on hopes of peace, but the physical supply problem hasn’t disappeared.
On November 1, seven OPEC+ producers agreed to leave December production targets unchanged.
A day later, oil prices fell sharply as renewed diplomatic efforts raised hopes of ending the conflict with Iran.
But there is a complication that deserves attention.
A barrel of oil available at a production facility is not necessarily a barrel that can reach a refinery.
The conflict has disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, while security threats have pushed tanker insurance and freight costs higher.
According to Reuters, several Gulf producers remain below their production targets despite earlier increases in permitted output.
That creates two separate problems.
First, countries may struggle to produce as much oil as their quotas allow.
Second, even when oil is produced, transporting it can become more expensive, slower or riskier.
And those additional costs do not necessarily disappear the moment crude futures decline.
A refinery buying imported oil must consider the delivered cost, including transportation and insurance. Higher shipping expenses can therefore continue squeezing margins even when benchmark oil prices retreat.
The consequences extend beyond energy markets.
Expensive fuel and transportation can feed into consumer prices, potentially complicating the inflation outlook.
For gold, persistent inflation combined with restrictive monetary policy creates competing forces: concerns about purchasing power may support demand, while elevated real interest rates can weigh on prices.
There is also a possible turning point. If diplomacy restores shipping routes and producers rebuild output, supply conditions could improve substantially.
The next meaningful signal may not come from another OPEC+ meeting. It may come from falling tanker costs, recovering exports and oil finally reaching its destination.
Leave a Reply