One ounce of gold, one ounce of silver — and a launch price of $5,490.
That was the listed price of the U.S. Mint’s September 24 Saint-Gaudens release, which paired one ounce of gold with one ounce of silver. It is a collector product whose value goes beyond the metal content alone.
For us, however, the investment question starts with how much of that purchase price a future buyer will be willing to recognize.
When we pay a physical premium, part of our money goes above the underlying value of the gold or silver itself. Whether we recover that amount at resale depends partly on the premium the market is willing to pay in the future. Gold can rise while demand for a specific collectible product falls.
The metal price and the collector premium can move independently.
Consider a simple example. An investor buys a coin at a 20% premium over its metal value. The underlying metal then rises by 10%, but at resale the investor receives only the new metal value, with no collector premium. The proceeds would still be about 8.3% below the original purchase price, before any additional costs.
This is only a hypothetical example, not a forecast for the Saint-Gaudens set. It simply shows why a rising gold price does not automatically make a collectible purchase profitable.
At Silver Dominion, we prefer a straightforward approach: recognizable coins and bars, competitive pricing, and a clear resale market.
We also compare dealer buyback prices. A low purchase premium is much more useful when the gap between the buying and selling price is also reasonable.
Collectors may be happy to pay for artistry, history, or completing a series. Our priority when investing in physical gold and silver is to accumulate the metal itself as efficiently as possible.
Before paying a higher premium, we want to know who might be willing to pay it back to us later.
Leave a Reply