Over the course of just a few days in August, something happened around one of China’s largest gold groups that, in my view, deserves far more attention than the market has given it so far.
And it matters because China’s Gold Market is becoming increasingly important to physical gold flows and global price discovery.
First, the United States added Shandong Gold Mining, Shandong Gold Smelting, and Xinjiang Jinchuan Mining to a list under the U.S. UFLPA law. Two days later, the LBMA suspended Shandong Gold Smelting from its lists of approved gold and silver refiners. Then, on August 13, COMEX followed by restricting newly registered gold and silver from the brand produced from August 5, 2026 onward for physical delivery.
At first glance, this may look like a regulatory issue involving a single Chinese refinery.
But when viewed alongside what Hong Kong and the Shanghai Gold Exchange are building at the same time, the story begins to look very different.
On the Western side, new barriers are emerging for certain Chinese gold flows. At the same time, China is building infrastructure that allows larger amounts of physical metal to be stored, traded, and settled within its own financial system.
To me, that is more important than the Shandong Gold case itself.
The real question is where a specific gold bar is accepted, where it can be used to settle a transaction, and how freely it can move through the global market.
And this is where a wider gap between the Western and Chinese physical gold markets could gradually begin to emerge.
How U.S. Restrictions Are Reshaping China’s Gold Market
The U.S. decision took effect on August 3. The United States added Shandong Gold Mining, Shandong Gold Smelting, and Xinjiang Jinchuan Mining to the UFLPA Entity List.
UFLPA stands for the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act. Put simply, it is a U.S. law designed to restrict imports of goods that may be connected to forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region.
When a company is placed on this list, it does not mean its gold suddenly ceases to exist or that nobody anywhere in the world can buy it. But access to the U.S. market becomes considerably more difficult.
Shortly afterward, the LBMA — London Bullion Market Association — responded as well.
The LBMA sits at the center of London’s wholesale gold and silver market. For an ordinary investor, it may seem somewhat removed from everyday bullion investing, but its importance is enormous. Among other things, it establishes the rules that determine which refiners and bullion bars are accepted within the London system.
From August 5, 2026, Shandong Gold Smelting was temporarily suspended from the Gold and Silver Good Delivery Lists.
The term Good Delivery is worth explaining. It is a market standard that determines which refiners and which bullion bars meet the requirements of the large professional precious-metals market.
If a refinery is on this list, its bars have a much easier path into the London system and can be more readily accepted by banks and other major institutions.
The LBMA also launched a review of the case. Shandong Gold has therefore not been permanently removed. The suspension remains in place while the situation is being reviewed.
Then came COMEX.
COMEX is the U.S. market where futures contracts on gold, silver, and other commodities are traded. A futures contract is essentially an agreement to buy or sell a specified quantity of an asset in the future under predetermined terms.
Most of these contracts do not end with physical delivery, but the ability to make actual delivery remains an important part of how the system functions.
On August 13, COMEX announced that gold and silver produced by Shandong Gold Smelting from August 5 onward would no longer be eligible, until further notice, for new registration for physical delivery against the relevant futures contracts.
Metal produced before that date did not lose its eligibility.
And this detail is what I find particularly interesting.
A gold bar produced on August 4 and an almost identical bar produced on August 6 can have the same purity, the same weight, and the same physical properties.
Yet they may no longer have the same market acceptability.
Same Gold, but Not Necessarily the Same Route Through the Market
This brings us to a part of the physical gold market that many ordinary investors rarely think about.
Gold may be gold, but within the wholesale financial system, not every bar is automatically equally usable.
The London market commonly uses gold bars weighing around 400 troy ounces, or roughly 12.5 kilograms. To circulate smoothly between large banks and institutions, they must meet specific standards covering areas such as purity, weight, markings, and origin.
This standardization creates what is known as fungibility — in simple terms, interchangeability.
If two bars meet the same recognized standard, one can effectively substitute for the other in a transaction.
Regulatory restrictions, however, can weaken that interchangeability.
That is why I would not describe the Shandong Gold suspension as evidence that “gold is running out” or that the London or American system is collapsing.
Something else is more interesting.
The physical metal can continue to exist while the number of places where it can be used without additional complications begins to shrink.
What can matter includes:
- which refinery produced it,
- when the bar was produced,
- which exchange it is intended for,
- whether it meets the required standard,
- whether its origin is affected by specific regulations.
On COMEX, you may sometimes hear the term warranting. Essentially, it means registering specific metal in an approved warehouse so that it becomes eligible for physical delivery against an exchange-traded contract.
This is where we can begin to see the first signs of market fragmentation.
We do not need to see two dramatically different global gold prices.
It may be enough for one bar to circulate freely in Shanghai while facing restrictions in London or New York.
The metal has not disappeared. Only the map it is allowed to travel across has changed.
Hong Kong and Shanghai Are Building Their Own Infrastructure
This story would be far less significant if nothing were changing on the Chinese side of the market.
But quite a lot is changing.
On July 7, 2026, Hong Kong began trial operations of a centralized gold clearing and settlement system.
The word clearing may sound technical, but the principle is simple.
When two financial institutions trade with each other, someone needs to keep track of who owes what, who must deliver the money, who must deliver the gold, and whether the transaction has actually been completed.
Clearing organizes these obligations. Settlement is the point at which the money or physical metal is actually transferred.
The more efficient your own clearing and settlement infrastructure becomes, the less dependent you are on somebody else’s system.
Hong Kong also launched the first phase of a physical-delivery connection with the Shanghai Gold Exchange.
The Shanghai Gold Exchange is much more focused on physical metal than many Western futures markets, and China has long used it as one of the central parts of its domestic gold market.
The new connection is intended to make it easier to move and use bullion inventories between Shanghai and Hong Kong.
Hong Kong is also working to expand vaulting capacity, support additional gold ETFs, further develop futures markets, and build its own gold reference price known as HAU.
When vaults, physical delivery, exchange-traded products, clearing infrastructure, and a local price indicator are being developed at the same time, this is no longer just another place to trade gold.
It is becoming a more complete gold ecosystem.
The Hong Kong government has also said that it wants to increase gold storage capacity to more than 2,000 tonnes within three years.
If this infrastructure is actually used, China and Hong Kong will have far greater capacity to keep physical gold within their own financial system.
China does not need to replace London.
It only needs to become gradually less dependent on it.
Behind the Story Are Hundreds of Tonnes of Real Metal
Infrastructure alone does not guarantee anything.
You can build the largest vault in the world, but if nobody uses it, its significance will remain limited.
China is different.
According to World Gold Council data, China’s net gold imports reached 152 tonnes in June, the highest level since March 2024.
During the first half of 2026, the country imported approximately 764 tonnes, an increase of 138% from a year earlier.
At the same time, the People’s Bank of China, or PBoC, continues to buy gold.
In July, according to reported figures, it added another 20 tonnes of gold. China’s official gold reserves therefore rose to approximately 2,366 tonnes, extending the reported monthly buying streak to 21 consecutive months.
The word official matters here.
The actual amount of gold held by the Chinese state or state-controlled institutions could be higher. Some estimates assume that not all holdings necessarily appear immediately in the central bank’s officially reported reserves.
We do not know the precise size of any such unreported holdings.
Still, I think it is reasonable to consider the possibility that 2,366 tonnes may not represent the complete picture of gold held across China’s state-controlled sector.
Chinese gold ETFs also held approximately 282 tonnes of gold in July.
When the numbers are placed side by side, the scale of the market becomes much easier to see:
| Indicator | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Net gold imports — June 2026 | 152 t | Highest since March 2024 |
| Net gold imports — H1 2026 | 764 t | +138% year over year |
| Official PBoC gold reserves | 2,366 t | 21 consecutive months of reported purchases |
| PBoC purchases in July | 20 t | Largest monthly increase since late 2023 |
| Chinese gold ETFs | 282 t | +5 t during July |
| Total Chinese gold demand — H1 | 518 t | Above the 10-year average of 476 t |
I would not cherry-pick only the numbers that support a bullish view of gold.
Chinese gold jewelry demand fell by approximately 30% year over year during the first half of the year.
At current gold prices, that makes sense. Jewelry is partly a consumer purchase, and rising prices naturally discourage some buyers.
What I find much more important is the changing structure of demand.
Investment purchases through bars, coins, and ETFs accounted for approximately 66% of total Chinese gold demand during the first half of the year.
In other words, Chinese buyers are not purchasing gold only for jewelry.
An increasingly large share of demand is connected to gold’s role as an investment asset, a reserve, and a store of value.
If new vaults, physical settlement channels, and domestic financial products are being developed at the same time, the pieces begin to fit together.
Is Gold Price Discovery Shifting From London to China?
It would be an exaggeration to say that Shanghai is now taking over global gold price discovery.
London has enormous liquidity, infrastructure built over decades, and a vast network of banks, refiners, and vaults. COMEX remains crucial for futures trading and hedging, meaning protection against adverse price movements.
But something is changing.
One long-standing indicator of Chinese physical gold demand is the Shanghai premium.
Its meaning is straightforward.
If gold trades at a higher price in Shanghai than in London, it means Chinese buyers are willing to pay more for the metal.
That price difference creates an economic incentive to import gold into China.
When bullion can move freely between markets, arbitrage comes into play. Traders buy gold where it is cheaper and sell it where it is more expensive, gradually narrowing the price difference.
But arbitrage works best when there are as few barriers as possible between markets.
If regulatory restrictions increase, transportation costs rise, or accepted standards begin to diverge, bringing prices back into alignment can become more difficult.
And this is where China’s new infrastructure starts to matter.
If increasing amounts of gold are stored directly in Hong Kong and Shanghai, traded through local products, and settled through local infrastructure, the Shanghai premium will no longer be the only metric worth watching.
The liquidity of the Asian market will matter too.
Liquidity simply describes how easily an asset can be bought or sold in substantial quantities without a single transaction moving the price dramatically.
The deeper and more liquid the Chinese market becomes, the more influence its price formation could eventually have on the rest of the world.
Hong Kong is also developing its own HAU gold price indicator, which could serve as another reference point for the local market.
What I Will Be Watching Next
The physical gold market may gradually become more regional.
We may continue to see one global gold price on our screens. Beneath that price, however, differences could grow in where a specific bar is accepted, which vault it can enter, which exchange can use it, and how easily it can move between regions.
That is why I will be watching four things closely over the coming months:
- The outcome of the LBMA review of Shandong Gold. If the suspension is lifted, the current situation may remain relatively isolated. If it becomes long-term, the case will carry much greater significance.
- COMEX’s next steps. In particular, whether the restrictions remain limited to a single brand and whether any changes become visible in physical gold flows.
- Actual volumes moving between Hong Kong and the Shanghai Gold Exchange. Building infrastructure is one thing. Filling it with metal and liquidity is another.
- Chinese imports, central-bank purchases, and investment demand. The combination of real physical metal and expanding infrastructure may prove to be the most important factor.
I will also be watching the Shanghai premium and the further development and adoption of the HAU gold price indicator.
If more transactions begin using prices formed during Asian trading hours while the quantity of physical gold stored directly in the region continues to rise, it will become increasingly difficult to argue that China’s gold market is simply a passive price taker from the West.
That is why I think the developments surrounding Shandong Gold are more important than they may initially appear.
Gold remains a global asset. But the infrastructure that determines how physical gold moves around the world is becoming increasingly regional.
Leave a Reply